BBC have known about phone hacking for years
Filed Under Communications
The BBC was fully aware that hacking into people’s answerphone messages was a widespread journalistic practice as long ago as 1997.
If proof is needed, just watch this clip from the pilot episode of Jonathan Creek called ‘The Wrestler’s Tomb’ – produced by the BBC’s own in-house entertainment department, and aired on 10th May 1997.
In the episode, Caroline Quentin plays the role of a freelance investigative journalist called Maddie Magellan. In one scene she taps into the answerphone of a character she is investigating, by entering combinations of the possible message retrieval code until she gets the right one.
For activities such as this to make it to a drama series, it has to have been pretty widespread and well-known. Hacking into phone messages (albeit mobile ones) is at the heart of the current furore. Which makes all the denials we are hearing during the Leveson Inquiry seem like complete hypocrisy. It seems to me that it’s time for the BBC – and David Renwick (who conceived and wrote the series) - to explain where they got the idea from and how widespread the practice was. After all, we’re talking 14 years ago.
I wonder how many of the 9.31 million* people viewing the episode thought they were watching something that was wrong, let alone that would lead to the demise of The News of the World.
(*and that’s just the first airing of this episode, which has also been aired on several PBS stations in the U.S. and on BBC America, as well as countless repeats on Watch in the UK. Which begs the question as to whether there isn’t a touch of hypocrisy in the public’s surprise and outrage at such practices.)
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment
TV channels - why not +24 hours?
Filed Under Communications
Many TV channels are now broadcasting “+1″ - the one hour time delay to let you catch up on content.
But, apart from Sky2, none of them seem to be doing +24.
Yet, if you think about it, broadcasters are doing more and more to exploit the power of PR and recommendation. Yet you don’t get to see the programme people are talking about from the night before unless they are on iPlayer and the like (or one of the interminable BBC repeats.
Why just a one hour delay? Surely it would make much more sense to use this bandwidth to put a bigger delay in place and significantly improve audience figures…
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment
The myth of USP
Filed Under Communications
SP (Unique Selling Point or Unique Sales Proposition) is a useful concept, but is a poor description of a brand – and, inappropriately applied, fails to deliver what many brand owners want it to achieve. That’s because it can encourage narrow thinking about what a brand is, and how best to promote it.A lot of original brand thinking was done by ad agencies and I would argue that USP is a construct of the advertising mindset. Advertising requires a process of reducto ad absurdum, because it requires simplicity and single-mindedness of thought to get its message across in the limited time or space available.
But brands aren’t simple. They are complex and our reasons for inter-acting with them are often multifarious. The example I use in the UK is John Lewis the retailer. We don’t just use it because of – or only associate the brand with – ‘never knowingly undersold’. It’s also because of the range and quality of goods, the service, the ambiance to name but a few.
In other words brands are about a sum of knowledge - all the little things that we know and deem important to us. And it is all the touchpoints that confirm or force us to confront that knowledge.
The model I used to use was ‘brands as diamonds’. The top face might be the one we notice (the USP) but what makes it shine is all the other facets and how well polished they are.
Have you ever looked at the underside of an Innocent Smoothie bottle? To go so far as writing little messages there (I particularly liked”If you are reading this you must be really bored”) without ever talking about them in your marketing shows a brand that really understands itself and its consumers.
More recently I have been intrigued by the idea of brands as Velcro – lots of little hooks that people attach on to. A colleague - James Gordon-Macintosh - introduced me to this and has written about it here>.
I suspect that the truth lies somewhere in between - brands aren’t just about lots of little hooks - but they aren’t just about the ‘one big thing’ either.
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment
Go compare - the power of shouting
Filed Under Communications
There was a time when I thought that ‘comparethemeerkat’ was a superb piece of advertising. (Let’s ignore the fact that the meerkat campaign has lost its way - they are struggling to work out how to take it forward). When it arrived it made comparison sites mainstream. It was so unusual that it was hard to see how anyone could top it.
Then along came ‘Go compare’. Now I’m not saying by any means that it’s a great piece of advertising from an aesthetic point of view. But it’s hard to argue against the sheer compelling intrusiveness of the fat bloke singing. A really bad (good?) jingle, repeated time and again and it has entered our consciousness. The same with ‘we buy any car’. Naff jingle, but at least you remember it.
Luckily for comparethemarket the effect has probably been to grow the market and usage of such sites.
But the lesson for marketers is clear - for all the sophistication of the multi-media world in which we live, a good bit of shouting doesn’t half work
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment